24/7 — Client Support

+1(304) 900-6229

Key Assignment Draft Part 1 Craft a 1 page memo. Make sure to include the following points in the memo: Explain how legal barriers may or may not prohibit

Key Assignment Draft

Part 1

Craft a 1 page memo. Make sure to include the following points in the memo:

  • Explain how legal barriers may or may not prohibit information sharing at the different levels of government.
  • Include decision-making products as they relate to your chosen Key Assignment topic.
  • Review the Key Assignment selected strategy and determine what (if any) barriers there may be to information sharing.
  • Determine whether or not any barriers to information sharing are identified.
  • Determine whether or not an implementation plan addresses those identified barriers.
  • Determine how the strategy that you have selected fits into the overall information-sharing global structure.

Part 2

Review your selected strategy, conduct an assessment of the primary policies within the strategy (or the goals and objectives), and provide a detailed assessment of the pros and cons of each. Consider the intelligence cycle and the processing of information as well as interagency coordination and information sharing.

Complete a PowerPoint presentation of 8–10 slides, and include the following:

  • Assess the primary policies of the selected Key Assignment strategy.
  • Assess the pros and cons of each policy, taking into consideration the intelligence cycle and interagency coordination.
  • Provide any recommendations for improvements to the overarching goals and objectives or primary polices of the strategy.
  • Provide recommendations for implementation.
  • Submit a 1–2-page executive summary of your findings.
  • Include a cover slide and a reference slide.

Part 3

Please submit a draft of your Key Assignment, drawing from your work in previous weeks and 2–3 new pages.

Provide a written analysis of a specific intelligence and information-sharing strategy. Your draft should examine the strategy of an agency, such as the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), or any national strategy that involves intelligence and information sharing, such as intelligence-led policing. Your draft should be 15–20 pages in length and should provide an in-depth analysis to determine whether or not the current strategy meets the intelligence and information sharing needs for homeland security (HLS), and make recommendations for improvement.

The analysis will examine factors such as, but not limited to the following:

  • A brief description of the strategy to include the agency responsible for the strategy and the history and evolution of the document
  • An analysis of the agency’s past and current structure and capabilities
  • Identification of information-sharing barriers and an explanation of how and why they are classified as barriers
  • A description of the specific policies within the strategy
  • Identification of legal entities and legal barriers
  • A description of whether or not there are ethical and privacy considerations
  • The intelligence cycle
  • Interagency coordination

You must include a reference page using APA formatting.

Share This Post

Email
WhatsApp
Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Pinterest
Reddit

Order a Similar Paper and get 15% Discount on your First Order

Related Questions

Global Trends in Illicit Wildlife Trade The primary purpose of the project is to thoroughly investigate and define the dynamics of the global ‘Illicit

Global Trends in Illicit Wildlife Trade The primary purpose of the project is to thoroughly investigate and define the dynamics of the global ‘Illicit Wildlife Trade’ (IWT) to enhance theAustralian Border Force’s (ABF) ability to effectively counteract these illegal operations. Introduction-300 words Any lessons learnt or recommendations arising from research

In the mini lecture, we discussed the policy implications of trait theories. Primarily, we looked at the implications for treatment, rehabilitation, and

In the mini lecture, we discussed the policy implications of trait theories. Primarily, we looked at the implications for treatment, rehabilitation, and prevention. Let’s expand this discussion to the criminal justice system. Specifically, the adjudication stage. Please address the following: Should individuals with Antisocial Personality Disorder be held responsible for

n this discussion, you’ll complete your first of three Walk In My Shoes assignments. These learning activities, which will end in your final presentation,

n this discussion, you’ll complete your first of three Walk In My Shoes assignments. These learning activities, which will end in your final presentation, explore corrections through the perspectives of individuals most impacted by these systems. We’ll begin by reading two articles from “Life Inside,” a weekly first-person series written by real

part A (2.3 Discussion: Police Organizations) Why This Discussion? Now that you’ve learned about police organizations, it’s time to apply what you’ve

part A (2.3 Discussion: Police Organizations) Why This Discussion? Now that you’ve learned about police organizations, it’s time to apply what you’ve learned while acting again as the chief of the Atlanta Police Department. Since police chiefs are expected to make evidence-based decisions as police leaders, consider what evidence from the

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following: Using the technique of screening for suitability,

Description Deliverable Length: 2 pages (matrix may be enclosed in the paper) Complete the following: Using the technique of screening for suitability, feasibility, acceptability, distinguishability, completeness, and evaluation criteria, conduct a critical analysis to identify the most practical course of action (COA). Develop a comparison matrix slide that examines the COAs